Universal HealthcareBy NextBestFit

Annual appropriations from general revenue

The health budget is set every year alongside other spending.

Draft decision:RejectedConfidence: medium · not yet reviewed

Conflicts with the trust fund; underfunding risk.

Review ledger

How this path connects

Concrete changes if chosen

What would actually have to change in law, agencies, payment rules, or systems.

  1. Fund health through annual appropriations
  2. Set a real per-capita spending floor

Effects

Each effect has its own page: the evidence, the case that it is or isn't a real cost, and whom it affects.

The question it answers
Chronic underfunding by government budgets

Setting the health budget annually alongside other spending provides strong spending control and lets health compete openly with other priorities. Health funding is squeezed in downturns.

What it fixes

None identified.

What it creates or worsens

Who's affected

Who gains
Who loses
Other ways to soften the losses
  • A legal floor (e.g., per-capita spending cannot fall in real terms)

Where it has been tried

  • UK NHS: Years of below-trend budget growth after 2010 were followed by record waiting lists.
  • Canada: Federal transfers to provinces were cut in the 1990s, followed by longer waits.

Conflicts with (choose one or the other)

Other paths for “Chronic underfunding by government budgets”