Pay for activity on top of budgets
Pay extra for procedures beyond baseline volume to cut queues.
Pays for extra volume on top of budgets.
Review ledgerHow this path connects
This path
Pay for activity on top of budgets
Concrete changes if chosen
What would actually have to change in law, agencies, payment rules, or systems.
- Pay extra for procedures beyond baseline volume
Effects
Each effect has its own page: the evidence, the case that it is or isn't a real cost, and whom it affects.
What it fixes
- Longer waits if demand grows faster than capacity
Extra payment for procedures beyond baseline volume rewards throughput and cuts queues.
What it creates or worsens
- Raises spending or loosens control over it
Paying extra for procedures beyond baseline volume can increase spending.
- Low-value care and overtreatment
Extra payment beyond baseline volume creates an incentive to perform more procedures.
10 paths soften this
Evidence-based coverage decisionsLow-value care and overtreatmentChosenFeedback and clinician nudgesLow-value care and overtreatmentChosenModest copays with an income-based annual capUnderinsurance: covered, but can't afford to use itRejectedValue-based cost sharingUnderinsurance: covered, but can't afford to use itRejectedGlobal budgets for hospitalsU.S. prices are far higher than in other countriesChosenNo-fault compensation for medical injuryMalpractice system: slow, costly, and drives defensive medicineChosenNational health record and patient IDRecords don't follow patientsChosenSeparate public capital budget, planned regionallyUnder-investment in equipment and facilitiesChosenAccept somewhat slower adoptionSlower access to new drugs and technologyRejectedOnly flat, small charges on a few servicesCopays keep billing systems alive and still deter poorer patientsRejected
Who's affected
Who gains
- People with employer coverage
- Longer waits if demand grows faster than capacity: They are seen fastest today and would share one queue with everyone.
- People with ongoing or specialist care needs
- Longer waits if demand grows faster than capacity: They need specialists and procedures most often.
- Hospitals, clinics, and care organizations
- Low-value care and overtreatment: Per-service payments reward additional low-value care.
- Drug and device makers
- Low-value care and overtreatment: They sell devices and tests used in low-value care.
Who loses
- Taxpayers and public budgets
- Raises spending or loosens control over it: Public budgets pay the added spending.
- Low-value care and overtreatment: They pay for tests and treatments with little benefit.
- People with ongoing or specialist care needs
- Low-value care and overtreatment: Low-benefit tests and treatments expose them to harm.
- Health insurers, brokers, and their shareholders
- Low-value care and overtreatment: They pay for tests and treatments with little benefit.
Where it has been tried
- Sweden, Norway: Activity-based pay reduced waits.
- Norway: In Norway, hospital wait times to start treatment fell by 13% over four years to an average of 60 days in 2017, as the country combined activity-based funding with national waiting-time targets.Sources: The Commonwealth Fund (2017)