Universal HealthcareBy NextBestFit

Allow private insurance for covered services

People may buy private insurance to skip public queues.

Draft decision:RejectedConfidence: medium · not yet reviewed

Conflicts with banning duplicate private insurance.

Review ledger

How this path connects

This path
Allow private insurance for covered services
Creates or worsens

No new problems identified.

Concrete changes if chosen

What would actually have to change in law, agencies, payment rules, or systems.

  1. Allow private insurance for covered services
  2. Require minimum public hours for clinicians

Effects

Each effect has its own page: the evidence, the case that it is or isn't a real cost, and whom it affects.

The question it answers
Two-tier care: a private fast lane for those who can pay

Allowing private insurance to bypass public queues offers relief from waits and adds private money. Clinicians may move into private work, and care becomes unequal.

What it fixes
What it creates or worsens

None identified.

Who's affected

Who gains
Who loses
Other ways to soften the losses
  • Require minimum public hours

Where it has been tried

  • UK, Australia: Private insurance coexists.
  • Australia: In Australia, where duplicate private insurance is permitted alongside public Medicare, 45.2% of the population (12.4 million people) held private hospital treatment cover as of December 2024.

Conflicts with (choose one or the other)

Other paths for “Two-tier care: a private fast lane for those who can pay”