Universal HealthcareBy NextBestFit

Employer health taxes can lower wages at firms that never offered coverage

When employers pay a payroll tax instead of premiums, firms that used to offer coverage save money, but firms that didn't (often low-wage, small, or gig) face a new cost that tends to come out of wages over time.

Evidence

Who's affected

Who is hurt
Who gains while it lasts

Under your mix of paths

Paths that create or worsen it
Paths that fix or soften it
Using your saved plan. 0 paths picked.Edit all picks
Root causes
  • Uniform payroll tax replacing uneven premium spending

Open questions

  • Should employers pay anything toward health care? If so, how should small and low-wage employers be treated?

Caused or worsened by these paths

This problem only matters if one of these paths is chosen.

Income-based premiums in a multi-payer systemPremiums are a large, flat, hidden tax on wagesRejected

Income-based premiums function as payroll contributions rather than a flat amount per worker.

Payroll tax (employer and employee)Replacing premiums with taxesRejected

A payroll tax imposes costs on low-wage firms and can hurt them.

Solution paths (2)

Open a path for what it fixes, what it creates or worsens, who gains and who loses, precedents, and how it connects to other paths. See all paths as a decision tree.

Lower rates for small firms and on the first part of wages.

  • +Employer health taxes can lower wages at firms that never offered coverage
  • −Leaves funding vulnerable or inflexible
  • −Requires difficult enforcement

Employers pay nothing; they must pass former premium spending into wages.

  • +Employer health taxes can lower wages at firms that never offered coverage
  • −Requires difficult enforcement
  • −Replacing premiums with taxes