Universal HealthcareBy NextBestFit

R&D is funded by high prices, which ties innovation to unaffordability

The industry spent $83B on R&D in 2019, about a quarter of net revenue, and developing a new drug costs roughly $1–2B+ including failures. Lowering prices lowers expected returns and the number of new drugs.

Evidence

Who's affected

Who is hurt
Who gains while it lasts

Under your mix of paths

Paths that fix or soften it
Using your saved plan. 0 paths picked.Edit all picks
Root causes
  • Private financing of risky R&D recovered through monopoly pricing

Related costs

Open questions

  • How should drug R&D be paid for: high prices, public funding, prizes, advance purchase commitments, or a mix?

Solution paths (3)

Open a path for what it fixes, what it creates or worsens, who gains and who loses, precedents, and how it connects to other paths. See all paths as a decision tree.

Increase NIH and public trial funding, especially for late-stage trials, so innovation relies less on high prices.

  • +R&D is funded by high prices, which ties innovation to unaffordability
  • −Raises spending or loosens control over it
  • −Government chooses which research gets funded

Pay large prizes or guaranteed purchases for drugs meeting set goals (e.g., new antibiotics), then sell at low prices.

  • +R&D is funded by high prices, which ties innovation to unaffordability
  • +Brand-name drug prices far above production cost
  • −Depends on uncertain evidence or judgments
  • −Government chooses which research gets funded

Pay high prices only for drugs with large added benefit; pay little for me-too drugs.

  • +R&D is funded by high prices, which ties innovation to unaffordability
  • +Brand-name drug prices far above production cost
  • −Adds paperwork, coordination, or complexity
  • −Depends on uncertain evidence or judgments
  • −Central coverage decisions can feel like rationing