Universal HealthcareBy NextBestFit

Rewrite insurance & benefits law

Effective in stages with each enrollment wave · Congress; DOL EBSA; Treasury; state insurance commissionersDiscuss this step

Pros & cons of this step

Pros
  • +Prevents a duplicative tier from draining capacity.
  • +Ending the exclusion removes a regressive subsidy that is worth more to high earners.
Cons
  • −The duplicative-coverage ban is a restriction on voluntary contracts; it will be litigated.
  • −Employers lose a flexible, tax-favored tool for recruiting.
  • Equity of a single tier vs. liberty to buy more.
high confidence

Choice: of plan vs. of doctor

People lose the choice of insurance plan but gain an unrestricted choice of doctors and hospitals, since networks disappear.

Today
Choice of plan is mostly the employer's choice: about half of firms offering coverage offer only one plan type. Narrow networks are common in Marketplace and MA plans.
Under the plan
One plan for everyone; every participating provider is in network.
Who gains
  • People in narrow-network plans
  • People who change jobs or move
Who loses
  • People who valued choosing between plans (e.g., MA vs. traditional Medicare)
  • People who would buy faster access if allowed

Magnitude: Qualitative.

  • Canada, Taiwan
    Free choice of physician within the public system; no plan choice.
Mitigations
  • Integrated care organizations provide a choice of care model.
Risk that remains: Opted-out providers create a de facto cash tier for the wealthy.

Trade-off behind each system change